Comments on: Repurposing ProQuest Metadata for Batch Ingesting ETDs into an Institutional Repository http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/1647 Wed, 22 May 2013 14:07:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Kate http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/1647/comment-page-1#comment-3781 Kate Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:50:23 +0000 http://journal.code4lib.org/?p=1647#comment-3781 Also– 008 15-17 is not just for publication, but also for place of production, etc.

Even if you don’t like to use place of production, is not putting these in an institutional repository publishing them to the web?

]]> By: Kate http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/1647/comment-page-1#comment-3780 Kate Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:48:30 +0000 http://journal.code4lib.org/?p=1647#comment-3780 Also, I notice you are not putting a date in the fixed field.

]]> By: Kate http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/1647/comment-page-1#comment-3779 Kate Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:46:53 +0000 http://journal.code4lib.org/?p=1647#comment-3779 Why are you coding theses in the fixed field as “manuscript”?

]]>