Comments on: Editorial Introduction: The Code4Lib Journal Experiment, Rejection Rates, and Peer Review http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3277 Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:45:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Jodi Schneider http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3277/comment-page-1#comment-3399 Jodi Schneider Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:21:50 +0000 http://journal.code4lib.org/?p=3277#comment-3399 Laurie, This question received some discussion on the public listserv. That may be a good place to follow up!

]]> By: Laurie http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3277/comment-page-1#comment-3390 Laurie Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:51:49 +0000 http://journal.code4lib.org/?p=3277#comment-3390 I admit I am one of the tenure-track librarians who just found this page in a search for information for my dossier.

Aware that the journal is not ranked and not peer-reviewed, I’m looking for qualitative information – has the journal, as a whole, received praise from prominent leaders or publications?

]]> By: Jakob http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3277/comment-page-1#comment-3101 Jakob Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:41:35 +0000 http://journal.code4lib.org/?p=3277#comment-3101 Congratulations to the 10th Code4Lib journal! I strongly agree with your description of the rejection rates and review process.

An addition you may want to experiment with an open proposal section and/or open submissions – but having a fairly open editorial committee is even better. Thanks to all of you :-)

]]>