<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Amazon Mechanical Turk to Transcribe Historical Handwritten Documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/6004/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/6004</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Session Proposal: Crowdsourcing - THATCamp American Historical Association 2012</title>
		<link>http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/6004/comment-page-1#comment-5609</link>
		<dc:creator>Session Proposal: Crowdsourcing - THATCamp American Historical Association 2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journal.code4lib.org/?p=6004#comment-5609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mechanical Turk or various freelancing sites?  If so, how do you ensure accuracy?  (One recent project introduced known bad data to transcripts before paying users to proofread and transcribed a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mechanical Turk or various freelancing sites?  If so, how do you ensure accuracy?  (One recent project introduced known bad data to transcripts before paying users to proofread and transcribed a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Lindahl</title>
		<link>http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/6004/comment-page-1#comment-5192</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journal.code4lib.org/?p=6004#comment-5192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This brings to mind the Project Gutenberg Distributed Proofreaders website (http://pgdp.net), which I&#039;ve used for handwritten documents such as an early 17th century Italian dance manual. It provides a lot of support for proofreading, such as a dictionary, division of labor (multiple rounds of proofreading and formatting), and a ready population of volunteer proofreaders, including enough Italian speakers to ensure that my project was done very accurately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brings to mind the Project Gutenberg Distributed Proofreaders website (<a href="http://pgdp.net" rel="nofollow">http://pgdp.net</a>), which I&#8217;ve used for handwritten documents such as an early 17th century Italian dance manual. It provides a lot of support for proofreading, such as a dictionary, division of labor (multiple rounds of proofreading and formatting), and a ready population of volunteer proofreaders, including enough Italian speakers to ensure that my project was done very accurately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
